There is a troubling division between native-born residents and those who have made a conscious choice to call Coopertown “home.” Local voices have labeled those who’ve moved here as “carpetbaggers,” “foreigners,” and “liberals” trying to turn Coopertown into “Little California” and other similarly pejorative statements. One mayoral candidate used the term “foreigners come lately” and another candidate’s facebook group has a post calling them the “Coopertown Carpetbaggers Association.” Such language fosters hostility and alienates those who are committed to the community’s future. This phenomenon, which we might call “Place-ism,” (yes, its a made-up term) judges individuals based on their hometown origins rather than their local community contributions, mimicking racial discriminatory behaviors and attitudes of the past.
Ironically, many of the city officials who actively participate in local government were not born and raised in Coopertown, while many native residents choose not to engage in the government process, preferring instead to criticize and ridicule from the sidelines. This disconnect is damaging, as it prevents meaningful collaboration and progress for our town. People who have moved to Coopertown have chosen this place intentionally, contributing to its development, vibrancy, and community.
This notion of “place-ism” undermines community unity. It perpetuates the idea that only those with deep roots in a location can influence its future, marginalizing the voices of new residents who bring fresh perspectives, ideas and energy. This attitude is reminiscent of historical prejudices, making it important for Coopertown to move beyond such divisive rhetoric and embrace the shared goal of building a strong, cohesive community. It seems the community is generally on the same page based on the interactions and discussions at the recent event to meet the candidates. Why there is a small yet vocal group who continually feel the need to make those not born here feel inferior is beyond this author.
The benefits of having a diverse group of residents are clear. Newcomers bring different experiences, ideas, and resources that can help Coopertown grow and prosper, while native-born citizens have a deep grasp on the history, culture and soul of the community. Rejecting these contributions based on where someone is from not only hinders progress but also creates an unwelcoming environment that stifles community development and harmony.
It is essential for all residents, both new and native-born, to engage with each other constructively, valuing each person’s commitment to the town. Fostering a welcoming atmosphere that encourages participation in local government can help bridge the gap between different groups and ensure that all voices are heard. We may not all agree on a given path forward, but the outcomes we all want seem pretty well aligned.
The path forward for Coopertown lies in recognizing the value of every citizen, regardless of their origins. By overcoming “Place-ism” and encouraging collaboration, Coopertown can become a stronger community where everyone’s contributions are valued and respected. For the church-goers among us, a reminder to “love thy neighbor” may be in order.
